linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] efi_enabled(EFI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <572802B2.4020204@huawei.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 May 2016 09:45:22 +0800
From:	Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@...wei.com>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
	Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
	"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	"Xen Devel" <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use



On 2016/5/2 18:45, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Sun, 01 May, at 10:36:51PM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> So is there any other way you suggest?
> 
> Would this work (compile tested but not runtime tested)?
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> index 3a69ed5ecfcb..13d8be16447a 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> @@ -469,12 +469,14 @@ device_initcall(efi_load_efivars);
>  		FIELD_SIZEOF(struct efi_fdt_params, field) \
>  	}
>  
> -static __initdata struct {
> +struct params {
>  	const char name[32];
>  	const char propname[32];
>  	int offset;
>  	int size;
> -} dt_params[] = {
> +};
> +
> +static __initdata struct params fdt_params[] = {
>  	UEFI_PARAM("System Table", "linux,uefi-system-table", system_table),
>  	UEFI_PARAM("MemMap Address", "linux,uefi-mmap-start", mmap),
>  	UEFI_PARAM("MemMap Size", "linux,uefi-mmap-size", mmap_size),
> @@ -482,44 +484,83 @@ static __initdata struct {
>  	UEFI_PARAM("MemMap Desc. Version", "linux,uefi-mmap-desc-ver", desc_ver)
>  };
>  
> +static __initdata struct params xen_fdt_params[] = {
> +	UEFI_PARAM("System Table", "xen,uefi-system-table", system_table),
> +	UEFI_PARAM("MemMap Address", "xen,uefi-mmap-start", mmap),
> +	UEFI_PARAM("MemMap Size", "xen,uefi-mmap-size", mmap_size),
> +	UEFI_PARAM("MemMap Desc. Size", "xen,uefi-mmap-desc-size", desc_size),
> +	UEFI_PARAM("MemMap Desc. Version", "xen,uefi-mmap-desc-ver", desc_ver)
> +};
> +
> +#define EFI_FDT_PARAMS_SIZE	ARRAY_SIZE(fdt_params)
> +
> +static __initdata struct {
> +	const char *uname;
> +	struct params *params;
> +} dt_params[] = {
> +	{ "hypervisor", xen_fdt_params },
While the uefi params are located under /hypervisor/uefi node not
/hypervisor node.

> +	{ "chosen", fdt_params },
> +};
> +
>  struct param_info {
>  	int found;
>  	void *params;
> +	const char *missing;
>  };
>  
> -static int __init fdt_find_uefi_params(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> -				       int depth, void *data)
> +static int __init __find_uefi_params(unsigned long node,
> +				     struct param_info *info,
> +				     struct params *params)
>  {
> -	struct param_info *info = data;
>  	const void *prop;
>  	void *dest;
>  	u64 val;
>  	int i, len;
>  
> -	if (depth != 1 || strcmp(uname, "chosen") != 0)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dt_params); i++) {
> -		prop = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, dt_params[i].propname, &len);
> -		if (!prop)
> +	for (i = 0; i < EFI_FDT_PARAMS_SIZE; i++) {
> +		prop = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, params[i].propname, &len);
> +		if (!prop) {
> +			info->missing = params[i].name;
>  			return 0;
> -		dest = info->params + dt_params[i].offset;
> +		}
> +
> +		dest = info->params + params[i].offset;
>  		info->found++;
>  
>  		val = of_read_number(prop, len / sizeof(u32));
>  
> -		if (dt_params[i].size == sizeof(u32))
> +		if (params[i].size == sizeof(u32))
>  			*(u32 *)dest = val;
>  		else
>  			*(u64 *)dest = val;
>  
>  		if (efi_enabled(EFI_DBG))
> -			pr_info("  %s: 0x%0*llx\n", dt_params[i].name,
> -				dt_params[i].size * 2, val);
> +			pr_info("  %s: 0x%0*llx\n", params[i].name,
> +				params[i].size * 2, val);
>  	}
> +
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> +static int __init fdt_find_uefi_params(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> +				       int depth, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct param_info *info = data;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dt_params); i++) {
> +
> +		if (depth != 1 || strcmp(uname, dt_params[i].uname) != 0) {
> +			info->missing = dt_params[i].params[0].name;
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
So here it needs to check whether the node is /hypervisor. If so, get
the subnode "uefi". Like below:
if (strcmp(uname, "hypervisor") == 0) {
	offset = of_get_flat_dt_subnode_by_name(node, "uefi");
	if (offset < 0)
		return 0;
	node = offset;
}

> +		return __find_uefi_params(node, info, dt_params[i].params);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int __init efi_get_fdt_params(struct efi_fdt_params *params)
>  {
>  	struct param_info info;
> @@ -535,7 +576,7 @@ int __init efi_get_fdt_params(struct efi_fdt_params *params)
>  		pr_info("UEFI not found.\n");
>  	else if (!ret)
>  		pr_err("Can't find '%s' in device tree!\n",
> -		       dt_params[info.found].name);
> +		       info.missing);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 

-- 
Shannon