linux-kernel - [PATCH for v4.6] lib/stackdepot: avoid to return 0 handle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1462252403-1106-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Date:	Tue,  3 May 2016 14:13:23 +0900
From:	js1304@...il.com
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: [PATCH for v4.6] lib/stackdepot: avoid to return 0 handle

From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>

Recently, we allow to save the stacktrace whose hashed value is 0.
It causes the problem that stackdepot could return 0 even if in success.
User of stackdepot cannot distinguish whether it is success or not so we
need to solve this problem. In this patch, 1 bit are added to handle
and make valid handle none 0 by setting this bit. After that, valid handle
will not be 0 and 0 handle will represent failure correctly.

Fixes: 33334e25769c ("lib/stackdepot.c: allow the stack trace hash
to be zero")
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
---
 lib/stackdepot.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/stackdepot.c b/lib/stackdepot.c
index 9e0b031..53ad6c0 100644
--- a/lib/stackdepot.c
+++ b/lib/stackdepot.c
@@ -42,12 +42,14 @@
 
 #define DEPOT_STACK_BITS (sizeof(depot_stack_handle_t) * 8)
 
+#define STACK_ALLOC_NULL_PROTECTION_BITS 1
 #define STACK_ALLOC_ORDER 2 /* 'Slab' size order for stack depot, 4 pages */
 #define STACK_ALLOC_SIZE (1LL << (PAGE_SHIFT + STACK_ALLOC_ORDER))
 #define STACK_ALLOC_ALIGN 4
 #define STACK_ALLOC_OFFSET_BITS (STACK_ALLOC_ORDER + PAGE_SHIFT - \
 					STACK_ALLOC_ALIGN)
-#define STACK_ALLOC_INDEX_BITS (DEPOT_STACK_BITS - STACK_ALLOC_OFFSET_BITS)
+#define STACK_ALLOC_INDEX_BITS (DEPOT_STACK_BITS - \
+		STACK_ALLOC_NULL_PROTECTION_BITS - STACK_ALLOC_OFFSET_BITS)
 #define STACK_ALLOC_SLABS_CAP 1024
 #define STACK_ALLOC_MAX_SLABS \
 	(((1LL << (STACK_ALLOC_INDEX_BITS)) < STACK_ALLOC_SLABS_CAP) ? \
@@ -59,6 +61,7 @@ union handle_parts {
 	struct {
 		u32 slabindex : STACK_ALLOC_INDEX_BITS;
 		u32 offset : STACK_ALLOC_OFFSET_BITS;
+		u32 valid : STACK_ALLOC_NULL_PROTECTION_BITS;
 	};
 };
 
@@ -136,6 +139,7 @@ static struct stack_record *depot_alloc_stack(unsigned long *entries, int size,
 	stack->size = size;
 	stack->handle.slabindex = depot_index;
 	stack->handle.offset = depot_offset >> STACK_ALLOC_ALIGN;
+	stack->handle.valid = 1;
 	memcpy(stack->entries, entries, size * sizeof(unsigned long));
 	depot_offset += required_size;
 
-- 
1.9.1