linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] arm64: Add support for KVM with ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160503124618.GW27057@io.lakedaemon.net>
Date:	Tue, 3 May 2016 12:46:18 +0000
From:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
To:	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Cc:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>,
	kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	fu.wei@...aro.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	wei@...hat.com, al.stone@...aro.org, gg@...mlogic.co.uk,
	hanjun.guo@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] arm64: Add support for KVM with ACPI

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:21:24AM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 12:54:14PM +0000, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:13:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > [+ Thomas, Jason]
> > > 
> > > Do you have any objection against this going through the KVM tree? The
> > > dependencies are rather intricate, and Daniel gave us his green light
> > > already for the clocksource part.
> > > 
> > > If you'd rather maintain the usual flow, please let us know and we'll
> > > deal with it.
> > 
> > I've no objection.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
> > 
> Just to be clear, that's on all the irqchip patches, right?

Correct.

thx,

Jason.