linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] x86, boot: PUD VA support for physical mapping (x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5728BF03.1050303@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 May 2016 08:08:51 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc:	Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
	Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>,
	Alexander Popov <alpopov@...ecurity.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	gthelen@...gle.com, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] x86, boot: PUD VA support for physical mapping
 (x86_64)

On 05/03/2016 03:05 AM, Baoquan He wrote:
> I have a tiny concern about phys_pmd_init(), both phys_pud_init and
> phys_pte_init name 2nd parameter as 'addr', phys_pmd_init use 'address'.
> If this can be changed to make them look consistent completist would
> have a good sleep from now on.

Yes, consistency would be nice.  Even better would be to call them all
'phys_addr'.