[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160504063357.GA12846@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 08:33:57 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Amanieu d'Antras <amanieu@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] signals/sigaltstack: Report current flag bits in
sigaltstack()
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> sigaltstack()'s reported previous state uses a somewhat odd
> convention, but the concept of flag bits is new, and we can do the
> flag bits sensibly. Specifically, let's just report them directly.
>
> This will allow saving and restoring the sigaltstack state using
> sigaltstack() to work correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>
This SOB seems stray as well, so I've removed it too.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists