[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5729C2CC.7030806@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 10:37:16 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
To: olof@...om.net, arnd@...db.de, khilman@...libre.com
Cc: arm@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [for 4.7] arm-ccn: Enable building as module
On 28/04/16 16:05, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> arm-ccn driver uses irq_set_affinity, which is not exported and
> hence cannot be built as a module, eventhough we have all the
> bits ready. This patch makes use of the exported helper
> irq_set_affinity_hint() instead. Also, the __free_irq expects
> the affinity_hint to be NULL when we free the irq. So set the
> affinity_hint to NULL at clean up.
>
> Now that we can build it as a module, update the Kconfig to
> reflect the change.
>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
> Acked-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Hi,
Could you please pull this for 4.7 ?
Thanks
Suzuki
> ---
> drivers/bus/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c | 7 ++++---
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/Kconfig b/drivers/bus/Kconfig
> index d4a3a31..3efc996 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/bus/Kconfig
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ config ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
> If unsure, say Y
>
> config ARM_CCN
> - bool "ARM CCN driver support"
> + tristate "ARM CCN driver support"
> depends on ARM || ARM64
> depends on PERF_EVENTS
> help
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c b/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
> index 7082c72..acc3eb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
> @@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ static int arm_ccn_pmu_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> perf_pmu_migrate_context(&dt->pmu, cpu, target);
> cpumask_set_cpu(target, &dt->cpu);
> if (ccn->irq)
> - WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(ccn->irq, &dt->cpu) != 0);
> + WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity_hint(ccn->irq, &dt->cpu) != 0);
> default:
> break;
> }
> @@ -1278,7 +1278,7 @@ static int arm_ccn_pmu_init(struct arm_ccn *ccn)
>
> /* Also make sure that the overflow interrupt is handled by this CPU */
> if (ccn->irq) {
> - err = irq_set_affinity(ccn->irq, &ccn->dt.cpu);
> + err = irq_set_affinity_hint(ccn->irq, &ccn->dt.cpu);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(ccn->dev, "Failed to set interrupt affinity!\n");
> goto error_set_affinity;
> @@ -1306,7 +1306,8 @@ static void arm_ccn_pmu_cleanup(struct arm_ccn *ccn)
> {
> int i;
>
> - irq_set_affinity(ccn->irq, cpu_possible_mask);
> + if (ccn->irq)
> + irq_set_affinity_hint(ccn->irq, NULL);
> unregister_cpu_notifier(&ccn->dt.cpu_nb);
> for (i = 0; i < ccn->num_xps; i++)
> writel(0, ccn->xp[i].base + CCN_XP_DT_CONTROL);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists