[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1462355477.27858.161.camel@nexus-software.ie>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 10:51:17 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dmaengine <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Puustinen, Ismo" <ismo.puustinen@...el.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] serial: 8250_lpss: move Quark code from PCI
driver
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 12:42 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue
> <pure.logic@...us-software.ie> wrote:
> > Andy,
> >
> > If you are going to start removing working PCI devices from the PCI
> > config table in favour of a shim in SERIAL_8250_LPSS then the very
> > minimum should be some sort of dependency link between
> > SERIAL_8250_LPSS
> > and CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PCI in kconfig.
> >
> > A user could reasonably read the QRK datasheet - switch on
> > CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PCI and then wonder why no console output
> > happened
> > on boot. S/he shouldn't have to know that devices were moved from
> > the
> > PCI driver to an LPSS shim driver or that the 8250_lpss driver now
> > needs to be selected instead of the intuitively correct 8250_pci
> > driver.
>
> That is taken care of since default is set to SERIAL_8250 (you even
> don't need to have PCI driver enabled!).
> Doesn't work for you?
The default may be set to SERIAL_8250 but, without the QRK specific
entry in 8250_pci.c you won't get console output.
So if you are going to remove the QRK entry from 8250_pci.c and stuff
it into 8250_lpss.c then 8250_lpss needs to be selected by
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PCI.
Otherwise the person doing the config needs to know that stuff was
moved from one file to another - even though it's a PCI device (not an
LPSS/ACPI enumerated device) - which seems like an unreasonable level
of knowledge to assume on the part of the user.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists