[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874maef8km.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 12:58:49 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Dan Allen <dan@...ndevise.io>,
Russel Winder <russel@...der.org.uk>,
Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
"linux-media\@vger.kernel.org linux-media"
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Graham Whaley <graham.whaley@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit
On Wed, 04 May 2016, Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de> wrote:
> but I think this will not by very helpful, as long as you miss
> a similar ".tmpl" workflow for reST documents.
>
> I'am working on a reST directive (named: "kernel-doc") to provide a
> similar ".tmpl" workflow within plain reST. The first step towards
> is done with (my) modified kernel-doc script ...
>
> * https://github.com/return42/sphkerneldoc/blob/master/scripts/kernel-doc#L1736
>
> which produce reST from source code comments. E.g. this content is
> generated with it.
What do you mean by ".tmpl workflow"?
I'd be *very* hesitant about adding the kind of things you do in
reformat_block_rst to kernel-doc. IMO the extraction from kernel-doc
comments must be as simple as possible with basically pass-through of
the comment blocks to sphinx. Specifically, do not attempt to detect and
parse elements like lists in kernel-doc.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists