linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: core: implement enhanced strobe support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5729E5E5.6000409@intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 4 May 2016 15:07:01 +0300
From:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
Cc:	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: core: implement enhanced strobe support

>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
>> index 4bc48f1..7e94b9d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c
>> @@ -332,12 +332,13 @@ int mmc_add_card(struct mmc_card *card)
>>                         mmc_card_ddr52(card) ? "DDR " : "",
>>                         type);
>>         } else {
>> -               pr_info("%s: new %s%s%s%s%s card at address %04x\n",
>> +               pr_info("%s: new %s%s%s%s%s%s card at address %04x\n",
>>                         mmc_hostname(card->host),
>>                         mmc_card_uhs(card) ? "ultra high speed " :
>>                         (mmc_card_hs(card) ? "high speed " : ""),
>>                         mmc_card_hs400(card) ? "HS400 " :
>>                         (mmc_card_hs200(card) ? "HS200 " : ""),
>> +                       mmc_card_hs400es(card) ? "Enhanced strobe" : "",
> 
> I am not sure this informations should be printed. It's still and
> HS400 card, there is no performance impact, right?

I actually asked for that I think.  HS400ES does not need re-tuning so there
is a performance and behavioural change which I think it is very useful to
know.  Kernels which don't support HS400ES will show "HS400" whereas kernels
which do support it will show something different.