[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAmzW4MRs-x5JF5XmEnHbPLJ5mRua_vPY_xpgivDyQvXc8HOSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 00:17:12 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for v4.6] lib/stackdepot: avoid to return 0 handle
2016-05-04 17:34 GMT+09:00 Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>:
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:13 AM, <js1304@...il.com> wrote:
>> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
>>
>> Recently, we allow to save the stacktrace whose hashed value is 0.
>> It causes the problem that stackdepot could return 0 even if in success.
>> User of stackdepot cannot distinguish whether it is success or not so we
>> need to solve this problem. In this patch, 1 bit are added to handle
>> and make valid handle none 0 by setting this bit. After that, valid handle
>> will not be 0 and 0 handle will represent failure correctly.
> Returning success or failure doesn't require a special bit, we can
> just make depot_alloc_stack() return a boolean value.
> If I'm understanding correctly, your primary intention is to reserve
> an invalid handle value that will never collide with valid handles
> returned in the future.
> Can you reflect this in the description?
Indeed. I will add it in the description and respin the patch.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists