linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 04/60] sparc/PCI: Use correct offset for bus address to resource

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1462322260.30470.76.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:	Wed, 04 May 2016 10:37:40 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Wei Yang <weiyang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, TJ <linux@....tj>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
	Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 04/60] sparc/PCI: Use correct offset for bus address
 to resource

On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 15:52 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> BenH and DavidM,
> Are you ok to let /proc/bus/pci/devices to expose resource value
> instead of
> BAR value?
> powerpc already expose MMIO as resource value, but still keep IO as
> BAR value?
> 
> Or can we just dump /proc/bus/pci support from now?

The problem tends to be old Xserver expectations...

That stuff has been a can of worms over the years and we did things in
the kernel to work around X limitations. I'm not that keen on touching
/proc at all in that regard. Leave it there do what it does today, it's
a user visible ABI, don't change it.

Cheers,
Ben.