| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1462305773-7832-12-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 04:02:52 +0800
From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: bsegall@...gle.com, pjt@...gle.com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
juri.lelli@....com, Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/12] sched/fair: Rename scale_load() and scale_load_down()
Rename scale_load() and scale_load_down() to user_to_kernel_load()
and kernel_to_user_load() respectively. This helps us tag them
clearly and avoid confusion.
[update calculate_imbalance]
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 8 ++++----
kernel/sched/fair.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 16 ++++++++--------
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index c82ca6e..349d776 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -698,12 +698,12 @@ static void set_load_weight(struct task_struct *p)
* SCHED_IDLE tasks get minimal weight:
*/
if (idle_policy(p->policy)) {
- load->weight = scale_load(WEIGHT_IDLEPRIO);
+ load->weight = user_to_kernel_load(WEIGHT_IDLEPRIO);
load->inv_weight = WMULT_IDLEPRIO;
return;
}
- load->weight = scale_load(sched_prio_to_weight[prio]);
+ load->weight = user_to_kernel_load(sched_prio_to_weight[prio]);
load->inv_weight = sched_prio_to_wmult[prio];
}
@@ -8184,7 +8184,7 @@ static void cpu_cgroup_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
static int cpu_shares_write_u64(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
struct cftype *cftype, u64 shareval)
{
- return sched_group_set_shares(css_tg(css), scale_load(shareval));
+ return sched_group_set_shares(css_tg(css), user_to_kernel_load(shareval));
}
static u64 cpu_shares_read_u64(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
@@ -8192,7 +8192,7 @@ static u64 cpu_shares_read_u64(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
{
struct task_group *tg = css_tg(css);
- return (u64) scale_load_down(tg->shares);
+ return (u64) kernel_to_user_load(tg->shares);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 4487c2a..200f752 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static void __update_inv_weight(struct load_weight *lw)
if (likely(lw->inv_weight))
return;
- w = scale_load_down(lw->weight);
+ w = kernel_to_user_load(lw->weight);
if (BITS_PER_LONG > 32 && unlikely(w >= WMULT_CONST))
lw->inv_weight = 1;
@@ -210,10 +210,14 @@ static void __update_inv_weight(struct load_weight *lw)
*
* Or, weight =< lw.weight (because lw.weight is the runqueue weight), thus
* weight/lw.weight <= 1, and therefore our shift will also be positive.
+ *
+ * Note load.weight falls back to user load scale (i.e., NICE_0's load is
+ * 1024), instead of possibly increased kernel load scale (i.e., NICE_0's
+ * load is NICE_0_LOAD) due to multiplication and division efficiency.
*/
static u64 __calc_delta(u64 delta_exec, unsigned long weight, struct load_weight *lw)
{
- u64 fact = scale_load_down(weight);
+ u64 fact = kernel_to_user_load(weight);
int shift = WMULT_SHIFT;
__update_inv_weight(lw);
@@ -7017,10 +7021,11 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s
*/
if (busiest->group_type == group_overloaded &&
local->group_type == group_overloaded) {
+ unsigned long min_cpu_load =
+ busiest->group_capacity * NICE_0_LOAD / SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
load_above_capacity = busiest->sum_nr_running * NICE_0_LOAD;
- if (load_above_capacity > scale_load(busiest->group_capacity))
- load_above_capacity -=
- scale_load(busiest->group_capacity);
+ if (load_above_capacity > min_cpu_load)
+ load_above_capacity -= min_cpu_load;
else
load_above_capacity = ~0UL;
}
@@ -8574,7 +8579,8 @@ int sched_group_set_shares(struct task_group *tg, unsigned long shares)
if (!tg->se[0])
return -EINVAL;
- shares = clamp(shares, scale_load(MIN_SHARES), scale_load(MAX_SHARES));
+ shares = clamp(shares, user_to_kernel_load(MIN_SHARES),
+ user_to_kernel_load(MAX_SHARES));
mutex_lock(&shares_mutex);
if (tg->shares == shares)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 1a3be6f..871da67 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -55,22 +55,22 @@ static inline void cpu_load_update_active(struct rq *this_rq) { }
*/
#if 0 /* BITS_PER_LONG > 32 -- currently broken: it increases power usage under light load */
# define NICE_0_LOAD_SHIFT (SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT + SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT)
-# define scale_load(w) ((w) << SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT)
-# define scale_load_down(w) ((w) >> SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT)
+# define user_to_kernel_load(w) ((w) << SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT)
+# define kernel_to_user_load(w) ((w) >> SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT)
#else
# define NICE_0_LOAD_SHIFT (SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT)
-# define scale_load(w) (w)
-# define scale_load_down(w) (w)
+# define user_to_kernel_load(w) (w)
+# define kernel_to_user_load(w) (w)
#endif
/*
* Task weight (visible to user) and its load (invisible to user) have
* independent resolution, but they should be well calibrated. We use
- * scale_load() and scale_load_down(w) to convert between them. The
- * following must be true:
- *
- * scale_load(sched_prio_to_weight[USER_PRIO(NICE_TO_PRIO(0))]) == NICE_0_LOAD
+ * user_to_kernel_load() and kernel_to_user_load(w) to convert between
+ * them. The following must be true:
*
+ * user_to_kernel_load(sched_prio_to_weight[USER_PRIO(NICE_TO_PRIO(0))]) == NICE_0_LOAD
+ * kernel_to_user_load(NICE_0_LOAD) == sched_prio_to_weight[USER_PRIO(NICE_TO_PRIO(0))]
*/
#define NICE_0_LOAD (1L << NICE_0_LOAD_SHIFT)
--
1.7.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists