linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/42] v7: separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <572A39BD.8020405@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 4 May 2016 13:04:45 -0500
From:	Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>
To:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	konrad.wilk@...cle.com, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
	philipp.reisner@...bit.com, lars.ellenberg@...bit.com,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	osd-dev@...n-osd.org, xfs@....sgi.com, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/42] v7: separate operations from flags in the
 bio/request structs

On 05/04/2016 12:58 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com> writes:
> 
>> On 05/03/2016 03:44 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>> Hi, Mike,
>>>
>>> That git tree doesn't seem to exist.  I did manage to apply your patch
>>> set on top of next-20160415, though.
>>>
>>> So... what testing did you do? ;-) I ran into the following problems
>>
>> I normally run xfstests and run it on my daily workstation and laptop. I
>> did not do this for every FS this time and hit a regression.
>>
>> What FS were you using?
> 
> I'm using xfs, scsi disk, no blk-mq, no dm.
> 
>>> - git clone fails
>>> - yum segfaults
>>
>> In v7/v6, I missed a new submit_bio call, so I hit issues like the two
>> above. I have this fixed in the next version.
> 
> OK, does this mean you're posting another version, or you already did
> and I somehow missed it?
> 

I did not repost yet. I am still testing. Jens had me add some wrappers
around the operation access, so because of my last screw up and the
wrapper change affected all my patches I am redoing all my testing.