[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8797d828-eb71-c747-f63a-e77762c51d82@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 06:59:54 +0300
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC: Kishon <kishon@...com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap: Use dma_request_chan() for requesting DMA
channel
On 05/03/2016 11:00 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>> @@ -1382,29 +1379,31 @@ static int mmc_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> goto err_free_iclk;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - dma_cap_zero(mask);
>>> - dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask);
>>> -
>>> host->dma_tx_burst = -1;
>>> host->dma_rx_burst = -1;
>>>
>>> - res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_DMA, "tx");
>>> - if (res)
>>> - sig = res->start;
>>> - host->dma_tx = dma_request_slave_channel_compat(mask,
>>> - omap_dma_filter_fn, &sig, &pdev->dev, "tx");
>>> - if (!host->dma_tx)
>>> - dev_warn(host->dev, "unable to obtain TX DMA engine channel %u\n",
>>> - sig);
>>> -
>>> - res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_DMA, "rx");
>>> - if (res)
>>> - sig = res->start;
>>> - host->dma_rx = dma_request_slave_channel_compat(mask,
>>> - omap_dma_filter_fn, &sig, &pdev->dev, "rx");
>>> - if (!host->dma_rx)
>>> - dev_warn(host->dev, "unable to obtain RX DMA engine channel %u\n",
>>> - sig);
>>> + host->dma_tx = dma_request_chan(&pdev->dev, "tx");
>>> + if (IS_ERR(host->dma_tx)) {
>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(host->dma_tx);
>>> + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>>> + goto err_free_iclk;
>
> and one clk_put(host->fclk) is missing from here.
>
>>> +
>>> + host->dma_tx = NULL;
>>
>> Instead of setting this to NULL, let's keep its value and later check
>> it with IS_ERR() when needed.
>
> I thought about it, but decided against without need to have changes in other
> places in the driver.
This sentence does not make too much sense ;) Let's try it again:
So, I have considered to use PTR_ERR in the driver for the DMA channel, but I
wanted to avoid too broad changes in the driver. Keeping the ERR_PTR would
bring no runtime benefit since we only care if we have channel or not.
--
Péter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists