linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1640438.89cURul1Mm@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Wed, 04 May 2016 23:21:12 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module

On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 07:31:40 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26-04-16, 20:14, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > The IS_ENABLED() macro checks if a Kconfig symbol has been enabled either
> > built-in or as a module, use that macro instead of open coding the same.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c    | 14 +++++++-------
> >  drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h |  2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

Applied, thanks!