linux-kernel - Re: better patch for linux/bitops.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 May 2016 14:52:28 -0700
From:	John Denker <jsd@...n.com>
To:	tytso@....edu, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	noloader@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, andi@...stfloor.org,
	Sandy Harris <sandyinchina@...il.com>,
	cryptography@...edaemon.net, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: better patch for linux/bitops.h

On 05/04/2016 02:42 PM, I wrote:

> I find it very odd that the other seven functions were not
> upgraded. I suggest the attached fix-others.diff would make
> things more consistent.

Here's a replacement patch.
Same idea, less brain damage.
Sorry for the confusion.


View attachment "fix-others.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (2489 bytes)