[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <572A7AAD.5040201@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 15:41:49 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] x86/xsaves: Re-enable XSAVES
It's my fault, but you also need to go update
fpu__xfeature_set_state()
and
__raw_xsave_addr()
The theoretical problem is that you might ask for a __raw_xsave_addr()
of a component which has been compacted out of an XSAVES buffer and thus
has no address. We could work around this by doing a memmove() and
moving the components "up" after the one we are trying to set in order
to make space.
But, since we *always* call XSAVES with an instruction mask of -1 and
end up with a requested feature bitmap (RFBM) equal to XCR0, I think we
can do a shortcut because we'll practically *always* have an
xcomp_bv==RFBM==XCR0, which means that all (present) components will
always have an address.
So, the alternative to doing the memmove() is to add some WARN_ON_FPU()
checks to enforce xcomp_bv==RFBM==XCR0 in places where we call
XSAVES/XRSTORS and __raw_xsave_addr(), maybe more.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists