[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 15:00:11 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
eric.engestrom@...tec.com, rufus.hamade@...tec.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate
file
On 05/05/16 11:50, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Recently few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't
> consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and
> ifdef hackery makes it less readable.
>
> Move OF specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF
> is enabled.
>
> Compile-tested:
> - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled
> - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately)
>
Just gave it a spin on ARM64 Juno on top of linux-pm/bleeding-edge so
you can have:
Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists