[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 16:04:46 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, zengzhaoxiu@....com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/hweight: Get rid of the special calling
convention
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 03:02:37PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> You are looking at the version of a wrong program.
> gcc doesn't process assembly, it generates it.
> as is part of binutils, not gcc. "as --version".
I know. It doesn't matter a whole lot in this case if there's a subset
of gas versions which simply don't know about POPCNT and we do use
those in the kernel build.
Pending a better solution, I'll simply revert to the old, spelled POPCNT
bytes and don't bother with versions. Especially if someone tries to
build the kernel with some other compiler...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists