[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4160174.j7y8ElCmf4@wuerfel>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 18:29:27 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] asm-generic/io.h: allow barriers in io{read,write}{16,32}be
On Thursday 05 May 2016 18:35:45 Horia Geantă wrote:
> While reviewing the addition of io{read,write}64be accessors, Arnd
>
> -finds a potential problem:
> "If an architecture overrides readq/writeq to have barriers but does
> not override ioread64be/iowrite64be, this will lack the barriers and
> behave differently from the little-endian version. I think the only
> affected architecture is ARC, since ARM and ARM64 both override the
> big-endian accessors to have the correct barriers, and all others
> don't use barriers at all."
>
> -suggests a fix for the same problem in existing code (16/32-bit
> accessors); the fix leads "to a double-swap on architectures that
> don't override the io{read,write}{16,32}be accessors, but it will
> work correctly on all architectures without them having to override
> these accessors."
>
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>
> ---
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists