linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 05/13] power: pwrseq: Remove mmc prefix from mmc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <572C379F.6030504@samsung.com>
Date:	Fri, 06 May 2016 08:20:15 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	tjakobi@...h.uni-bielefeld.de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
	hverkuil@...all.nl,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 05/13] power: pwrseq: Remove mmc prefix from mmc_pwrseq

On 05/05/2016 09:09 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
> 
> On 05/05/2016 08:34 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The "mmc" prefix is no longer needed after moving the pwrseq core code
>> from mmc/ to power/.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>> ---
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/pwrseq/pwrseq_emmc.c b/drivers/power/pwrseq/pwrseq_emmc.c
>> index a0583ed46d7f..a68ac9a68e04 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/pwrseq/pwrseq_emmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/pwrseq/pwrseq_emmc.c
>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>>
> 
> I don't think this header inclusion is needed. At least I didn't see anything
> defined there that's used in this driver. This also applies to pwrseq_simple.
> 
> I think you could remove those in another preparatory patches before the move.
>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>

Good catch, thanks.

BR,
Krzysztof