[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160506071525.GB32359@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 15:15:25 +0800
From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, hverkuil@...all.nl,
tjakobi@...h.uni-bielefeld.de,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 00/13] usb/mmc/power: Fix USB/LAN when TFTP booting
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 08:12:24AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/06/2016 07:44 AM, Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 05:42:40PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 02:34:13PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> This is a different, second try to fix usb3503+lan on Odroid U3 board
> >>> if it was initialized by bootloader (e.g. for TFTP boot).
> >>>
> >>> First version:
> >>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg140042.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Problem
> >>> =======
> >>> When Odroid U3 (usb3503 + smsc95xx + max77686) boots from network (TFTP),
> >>> the usb3503 and LAN smsc95xx do not show up in "lsusb". Hard-reset
> >>> is required, e.g. by suspend to RAM. The actual TFTP boot does
> >>> not have to happen. Just "usb start" from U-Boot is sufficient.
> >>>
> >>> From the schematics, the regulator is a supply only to LAN, however
> >>> without toggling it off/on, the usb3503 hub won appear neither.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Solution
> >>> ========
> >>> This is very similar to the MMC pwrseq behavior so the idea is to:
> >>> 1. Move MMC pwrseq drivers to generic place,
> >>
> >> You can do that, but I'm going to NAK any use of pwrseq bindings outside
> >> of MMC. I think it is the wrong way to do things. The DT should describe
> >> the devices. If they happen to be "simple" then the core can walk the
> >> tree and do any setup. For example, look for "reset-gpios" and toggle
> >> that GPIO. There is no need for a special node.
> >>
> >
> > Oh, I am doing the same thing like this patch set doing.
>
> Shame on me that I did not use Google before starting the work. I could
> just extend your patchset. I think we can combine our efforts.
>
Sure :)
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists