[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E883BB9D7FB@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 08:32:00 +0000
From: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>
To: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] ACPI / tables: Fix DSDT override mechanism
Hi,
> From: linux-acpi-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-acpi-
> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Zheng, Lv
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] ACPI / tables: Fix DSDT override mechanism
>
> Hi,
>
> I also noticed this and was about to write a fix patch.
> The build issue wasn't caught by LKP, I noticed it during ACPICA release test.
> Thanks for doing this. :-)
>
> > From: linux-acpi-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-acpi-
> > owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Rafael J. Wysocki
> > Subject: [PATCH v2] ACPI / tables: Fix DSDT override mechanism
> >
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > Commit 5ae74f2cc2f1 (ACPI / tables: Move table override mechanisms to
> > tables.c) forgot to move the CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_FILE inclusion
> > directive from osl.c to tables.c. Fix that.
> >
> > Fixes: 5ae74f2cc2f1 (ACPI / tables: Move table override mechanisms to
> tables.c)
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > ---
> >
> > A cosmetic change.
> >
> > v1 -> v2: Move the new #include closer to the other #include directives in
> > tables.c.
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/osl.c | 4 ----
> > drivers/acpi/tables.c | 4 ++++
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> >
> ================================================================
> > ===
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> > @@ -36,6 +36,10 @@
> > #include <linux/memblock.h>
> > #include "internal.h"
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT
> > +#include CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_FILE
> > +#endif
> > +
> [Lv Zheng]
> IMO, we could move this closer to acpi_os_table_override.
> And move CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT out of this function to form the
> following style:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT
> #include CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_FILE
>
> acpi_status acpi_os_table_override(...)
> {
> }
> #else
> acpi_status acpi_os_table_override(...)
> {
> return AE_SUPPORT;
> }
> #endif
>
> We can return AE_SUPPORT from acpi_os_table_override() here, please refer
> to drivers/acpi/acpica/tbinstal.c.
> By doing so, we can:
> 1. make acpi_os_table_override clearer, and
> 2. make #ifdef maintained at function boundary, and
> 3. remove additional #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT, and
> 4. help to avoid same future mistakes.
>
[Lv Zheng]
What I said above may not be suitable for a stable material.
And I also noticed that not only DSDT override, but also initrd override need a similar stub change.
So we needn't them in this patch.
Acked-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Thanks and best regards
-Lv
>
> > #define ACPI_MAX_TABLES 128
> >
> > static char *mps_inti_flags_polarity[] = { "dfl", "high", "res", "low" };
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> >
> ================================================================
> > ===
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> > @@ -56,10 +56,6 @@ struct acpi_os_dpc {
> > struct work_struct work;
> > };
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT
> > -#include CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_FILE
> > -#endif
> > -
> > #ifdef ENABLE_DEBUGGER
> > #include <linux/kdb.h>
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> .�{.n�+�������+%��lzwm��b�맲��r��zX��.��(��.��ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v������
> �zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z�.�w���?����&�)ߢ.f
Powered by blists - more mailing lists