[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160506122643.GS6292@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 13:26:43 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
Sathyanarayana Nujella <sathyanarayana.nujella@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: da7219: Convert driver to use generic
device/fwnode functions
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 11:53:04AM +0100, Adam Thomson wrote:
> This change converts the driver from using the of_* functions to using
> the device_* and fwnode_* functions for accssing DT related data.
> This is in preparation for updates to support ACPI based initialisation.
Is this *really* sensible? DT idioms don't always match up with ACPI
idioms well and this isn't a trivial DT binding.
> +static struct fwnode_handle *da7219_aad_of_named_fwhandle(struct device *dev,
> + const char *name)
> +{
> + struct fwnode_handle *child;
> + struct device_node *of_node;
> +
> + /* Find first matching child node */
> + device_for_each_child_node(dev, child) {
> + if (is_of_node(child)) {
> + of_node = to_of_node(child);
> + if (of_node_cmp(of_node->name, name) == 0)
> + return child;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
There's nothing device specific about this, it should go in generic
code.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists