linux-kernel - RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2E89032DDAA8B9408CB92943514A0337D463C2D8@SW-EX-MBX01.diasemi.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 May 2016 13:39:10 +0000
From:	"Opensource [Adam Thomson]" <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	"Opensource [Adam Thomson]" <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sathyanarayana Nujella <sathyanarayana.nujella@...el.com>
Subject: RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree

On May 06, 2016, 13:03, Mark Brown wrote:

> > This patch was the 3rd in of a set of 3, and the header you added below was
> > added as part of the 2nd patch of that set, hence why it is missing here. I
> > assume the first 2 patches are still being reviewed by Mark.
> 
> Yes.  The ID patch should have been the first one here, put the simple
> stuff first.

In my mind it makes sense to only add this after support to use it is in place
in the driver, hence the ordering.