linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 4.4-stable] regulator: core: Ensure we lock all regulators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALAqxLVDikngEfnf78q6UWZY0m7+X6HP1n=F4eeAGExs6zqSNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 May 2016 10:57:01 -0700
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4.4-stable] regulator: core: Ensure we lock all regulators

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 05:43:37PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> It seems upstream commit 49a6bb7a1c09 ("regulator: core: Ensure
>> we lock all regulators"), was missed when considering tagging
>> for -stable.
>>
>> Without this varient of that patch (the original doesn't apply,
>> due to a later fix to the same which was backported), I see
>> double-unlock lockdep splats in the v4.4.8 based HiKey kernel.
>>
>> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>> CC: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.4 only (I think)
>> Fixes: 3c2c5fb9b99ca ("regulator: core: avoid unused variable warning")
>> Originally-Reported-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>
>> Originally-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
>> index 7b94b8e..732ac71 100644
>> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
>> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static void regulator_lock_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>>  {
>>       int i;
>>
>> -     for (i = 0; rdev->supply; rdev = rdev_get_supply(rdev), i++)
>> +     for (i = 0; rdev; rdev = rdev_get_supply(rdev), i++)
>>               mutex_lock_nested(&rdev->mutex, i);
>>  }
>>
>
> This should now all be fixed in 4.4.9, and this patch isn't needed,
> right?

Yea. Looks right to me in 4.4.9.

thanks!
-john