[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <572CECCD.2010205@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 15:13:17 -0400
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@...el.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, yingying.zhao@...el.com,
"Zhang, Xiong Y" <xiong.y.zhang@...el.com>,
1573231@...s.launchpad.net, 1397880@...s.launchpad.net,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [v4.6-rc1 Regression] x86/topology: Create logical package id
On 05/06/2016 02:48 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2016, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel
>> bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
>>
>> commit 1f12e32f4cd5243ae46d8b933181be0d022c6793
>> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Date: Mon Feb 22 22:19:15 2016 +0000
>>
>> x86/topology: Create logical package id
>>
>> To build successfully with this commit reverted, I also had to revert
>> commits: e7ee3e8,2d4de83,87f01cc and 33c3cc7.
>>
>> The regression was introduced as of v4.6-rc1.
>>
>> I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author. Do
>> you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
>> or would it be best to submit a revert request?
> Yuck. That dies with a divide error. And that looks like XEN is supplying crap
> data in the CPUID.
Joe, do you have
ed6069b xen/apic: Provide Xen-specific version of cpu_present_to_apicid
APIC op
-boris
>
> Does the patch below cure the issue?
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
> 8<---------------
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -332,6 +332,11 @@ static void __init smp_init_package_map(
> * primary cores.
> */
> ncpus = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores;
> + if (!ncpus) {
> + pr_warn("x86_max_cores == zero !?!?");
> + ncpus = 1;
> + }
> +
> __max_logical_packages = DIV_ROUND_UP(total_cpus, ncpus);
>
> /*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists