[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160507192425.GA13997@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 12:24:25 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, acme@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, jolsa@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] perf, tools, stat: Avoid fractional digits for
integer scales
> > if (csv_output) {
> > - fmt = sc != 1.0 ? "%.2f%s" : "%.0f%s";
> > + fmt = floor(sc) != sc ? "%.2f%s" : "%.0f%s";
> > } else {
> > if (big_num)
> > - fmt = sc != 1.0 ? "%'18.2f%s" : "%'18.0f%s";
> > + fmt = floor(sc) != sc ? "%'18.2f%s" : "%'18.0f%s";
> > else
> > - fmt = sc != 1.0 ? "%18.2f%s" : "%18.0f%s";
> > + fmt = floor(sc) != sc ? "%18.2f%s" : "%18.0f%s";
>
> how about the rest of the code? we display % also in print_running
> and print_noise_pct functions and maybe some place else
For those it doesn't matter. In fact it's probably better there
to always show the fractions.
It is just confusing for metrics.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists