[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160507061310.GA15728@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 08:13:10 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Invoke cpufreq hooks for CONFIG_SMP unset
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:58:43PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Commit 34e2c555f3e1 (cpufreq: Add mechanism for registering utilization
> update callbacks) overlooked the fact that update_load_avg(), where
> CFS invokes cpufreq utilization update hooks, becomes an empty stub for
> CONFIG_SMP unset. In consequence, if CONFIG_SMP is not set, cpufreq
> governors are never invoked from CFS and they do not have a chance to
> evaluate CPU performace levels and update them often enough. Needless
> to say, things don't work as expected then.
>
> Fix the problem by making the !CONFIG_SMP stub of update_load_avg()
> invoke cpufreq update hooks too.
>
> Fixes: 34e2c555f3e1 (cpufreq: Add mechanism for registering utilization update callbacks)
> Reported-by: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Rafael; feel free to push this through the pm tree.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists