linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] block: Add bdev_supports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hKpvF6uqBzV+1seUzFfxDZM-ApordAL_NecRLNcdNgwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 8 May 2016 12:14:28 -0700
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, david <david@...morbit.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
	micah.parrish@....com,
	"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] block: Add bdev_supports_dax() for dax mount checks

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com> wrote:
> DAX imposes additional requirements to a device.  Add
> bdev_supports_dax() which performs all the precondition checks
> necessary for filesystem to mount the device with dax option.
>
> Also add a new check to verify if a partition is aligned by 4KB.
> When a partition is unaligned, any dax read/write access fails,
> except for metadata update.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
> Cc: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>
> ---
>  fs/block_dev.c         |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/blkdev.h |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
> index 7be17c4..e51a2c3 100644
> --- a/fs/block_dev.c
> +++ b/fs/block_dev.c
> @@ -509,6 +509,48 @@ long bdev_direct_access(struct block_device *bdev, struct blk_dax_ctl *dax)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bdev_direct_access);
>
> +/**
> + * bdev_supports_dax() - Check if the block device supports DAX
> + * @sb: The superblock of the device
> + * @blocksize: The block size of the device
> + *
> + * Return: negative errno if unsupported, 0 if supported.
> + */
> +int bdev_supports_dax(struct super_block *sb, int blocksize)
> +{
> +       struct blk_dax_ctl dax = {
> +               .sector = 0,
> +               .size = PAGE_SIZE,
> +       };
> +       int err;
> +
> +       if (blocksize != PAGE_SIZE) {
> +               vfs_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "error: unsupported blocksize for dax");
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
> +
> +       err = bdev_direct_access(sb->s_bdev, &dax);
> +       if (err < 0) {
> +               switch (err) {
> +               case -EOPNOTSUPP:
> +                       vfs_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
> +                               "error: device does not support dax");
> +                       break;
> +               case -EINVAL:
> +                       vfs_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
> +                               "error: unaligned partition for dax");
> +                       break;
> +               default:
> +                       vfs_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
> +                               "error: dax access failed (%d)", err);
> +               }
> +               return err;
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bdev_supports_dax);

This patch should replace blkdev_dax_capable(), or just reuse that
existing routine, or am I missing something?