[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160508090148.GF15458@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 02:01:48 -0700
From: "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>
Cc: "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"boaz@...xistor.com" <boaz@...xistor.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
"xfs@....sgi.com" <xfs@....sgi.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>,
"jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>, "matthew@....cx" <matthew@....cx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] fs: prioritize and separate direct_io from dax_io
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 09:39:14PM +0000, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> How is it any 'less direct'? All it does now is follow the blockdev
> O_DIRECT path. There still isn't any page cache involved..
It's still more overhead than the play DAX I/O path.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists