lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 14:58:29 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com> To: Kangjie Lu <kangjielu@...il.com> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>, Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, taesoo@...ech.edu, insu@...ech.edu, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@...ech.edu> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix infoleak in fcntl On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Kangjie Lu <kangjielu@...il.com> wrote: > The stack object “si” has a total size of 128 bytes; however, only > 16 bytes are initialized. The remaining uninitialized bytes are > sent to userland via send_signal. How did you find all these leaks? Since you sent more than one patch I guess you used some tool, which one? -- Thanks, //richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists