linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix infoleak in fcntl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFLxGvwW+TaXb51P3BbQzQYEjzE1KHp6Q6S2uJJZ86gTm-jTyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 8 May 2016 14:58:29 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:	Kangjie Lu <kangjielu@...il.com>
Cc:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
	Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, taesoo@...ech.edu,
	insu@...ech.edu, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@...ech.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix infoleak in fcntl

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Kangjie Lu <kangjielu@...il.com> wrote:
> The stack object “si” has a total size of 128 bytes; however, only
> 16 bytes are initialized. The remaining uninitialized bytes are
> sent to userland via send_signal.

How did you find all these leaks?
Since you sent more than one patch I guess you used some tool, which one?

-- 
Thanks,
//richard