[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160509071838.158583669@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 09:18:23 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@....de>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
"Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@...hat.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 18/67] lpfc: fix misleading indentation
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
commit aeb6641f8ebdd61939f462a8255b316f9bfab707 upstream.
gcc-6 complains about the indentation of the lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array()
call in lpfc_online(), which clearly doesn't look right:
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c: In function 'lpfc_online':
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:2880:3: warning: statement is indented as if it were guarded by... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:2863:2: note: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not
if (vports != NULL)
^~
Looking at the patch that introduced this code, it's clear that the
behavior is correct and the indentation is wrong.
This fixes the indentation and adds curly braces around the previous
if() block for clarity, as that is most likely what caused the code
to be misindented in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Fixes: 549e55cd2a1b ("[SCSI] lpfc 8.2.2 : Fix locking around HBA's port_list")
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@....de>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -2855,7 +2855,7 @@ lpfc_online(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
}
vports = lpfc_create_vport_work_array(phba);
- if (vports != NULL)
+ if (vports != NULL) {
for (i = 0; i <= phba->max_vports && vports[i] != NULL; i++) {
struct Scsi_Host *shost;
shost = lpfc_shost_from_vport(vports[i]);
@@ -2872,7 +2872,8 @@ lpfc_online(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
}
spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
}
- lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports);
+ }
+ lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports);
lpfc_unblock_mgmt_io(phba);
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists