linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 30/67] xen/evtchn: fix ring resize when binding new events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160509071838.730974208@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Mon,  9 May 2016 09:18:35 +0200
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 30/67] xen/evtchn: fix ring resize when binding new events

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>

commit 27e0e6385377c4dc68a4ddaf1a35a2dfa951f3c5 upstream.

The copying of ring data was wrong for two cases: For a full ring
nothing got copied at all (as in that case the canonicalized producer
and consumer indexes are identical). And in case one or both of the
canonicalized (after the resize) indexes would point into the second
half of the buffer, the copied data ended up in the wrong (free) part
of the new buffer. In both cases uninitialized data would get passed
back to the caller.

Fix this by simply copying the old ring contents twice: Once to the
low half of the new buffer, and a second time to the high half.

This addresses the inability to boot a HVM guest with 64 or more
vCPUs.  This regression was caused by 8620015499101090 (xen/evtchn:
dynamically grow pending event channel ring).

Reported-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/xen/evtchn.c |   20 ++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/xen/evtchn.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/evtchn.c
@@ -316,7 +316,6 @@ static int evtchn_resize_ring(struct per
 {
 	unsigned int new_size;
 	evtchn_port_t *new_ring, *old_ring;
-	unsigned int p, c;
 
 	/*
 	 * Ensure the ring is large enough to capture all possible
@@ -346,20 +345,17 @@ static int evtchn_resize_ring(struct per
 	/*
 	 * Copy the old ring contents to the new ring.
 	 *
-	 * If the ring contents crosses the end of the current ring,
-	 * it needs to be copied in two chunks.
+	 * To take care of wrapping, a full ring, and the new index
+	 * pointing into the second half, simply copy the old contents
+	 * twice.
 	 *
 	 * +---------+    +------------------+
-	 * |34567  12| -> |       1234567    |
-	 * +-----p-c-+    +------------------+
+	 * |34567  12| -> |34567  1234567  12|
+	 * +-----p-c-+    +-------c------p---+
 	 */
-	p = evtchn_ring_offset(u, u->ring_prod);
-	c = evtchn_ring_offset(u, u->ring_cons);
-	if (p < c) {
-		memcpy(new_ring + c, u->ring + c, (u->ring_size - c) * sizeof(*u->ring));
-		memcpy(new_ring + u->ring_size, u->ring, p * sizeof(*u->ring));
-	} else
-		memcpy(new_ring + c, u->ring + c, (p - c) * sizeof(*u->ring));
+	memcpy(new_ring, old_ring, u->ring_size * sizeof(*u->ring));
+	memcpy(new_ring + u->ring_size, old_ring,
+	       u->ring_size * sizeof(*u->ring));
 
 	u->ring = new_ring;
 	u->ring_size = new_size;