[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160509073933.GC3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 09:39:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, Waiman.Long@....com,
jason.low2@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] locking/rwsem: Drop superfluous waiter refcount
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 09:56:08PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Read waiters are currently reference counted from the time it enters
> the slowpath until the lock is released and the waiter is awoken. This
> is fragile and superfluous considering everything occurs within down_read()
> without returning to the caller, and the very nature of the primitive does
> not suggest that the task can disappear from underneath us. In addition,
> spurious wakeups can make the whole refcount useless as get_task_struct()
> is only called when setting up the waiter.
So I think you're wrong here; imagine this:
rwsem_down_read_failed() rwsem_wake()
get_task_struct();
raw_spin_lock_irq(&wait_lock);
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &wait_list);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&wait_lock);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&wait_lock)
__rwsem_do_wake()
while (true) {
set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
waiter->task = NULL
if (!waiter.task) // true
break;
__set_task_state(tsk, TASK_RUNNING);
do_exit();
wake_up_process(tsk); /* BOOM */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists