lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160509085834.GE4107@pd.tnic>
Date:	Mon, 9 May 2016 10:58:34 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:	Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luto@...capital.net,
	tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	keescook@...omium.org, luto@...nel.org, dvlasenk@...hat.com,
	brgerst@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org, yinghai@...nel.org,
	mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/boot] x86/KASLR: Improve comments around the
 mem_avoid[] logic

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 04:49:38PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > + * The initrd, cmdline, and boot_params are trivial to identify for
> > + * avoiding. The are MEM_AVOID_INITRD, MEM_AVOID_CMDLINE, and
> 		~~~a typo, should be "They"

Can you please trim the rest of the quoted text when you're replying to
only this one issue?

Like I've done it.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
-- 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ