[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57308EB5.30707@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 06:20:53 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/23] 3.14.69-stable review
On 05/09/2016 12:17 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.14.69 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed May 11 07:16:11 UTC 2016.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 129 pass: 129 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 90 pass: 90 fail: 0
Runtime warnings (mainstone:mainstone_defconfig):
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/irq/chip.c:670 __irq_set_handler+0x118/0x128()
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 3.14.68-00023-g982ed6e #1
[<c000d23c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000b6ec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c000b6ec>] (show_stack) from [<c0015628>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x6c/0x8c)
[<c0015628>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0015664>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24)
[<c0015664>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0042f58>] (__irq_set_handler+0x118/0x128)
[<c0042f58>] (__irq_set_handler) from [<c0355a30>] (mainstone_init_irq+0x84/0xa4)
[<c0355a30>] (mainstone_init_irq) from [<c0352154>] (init_IRQ+0x14/0x1c)
[<c0352154>] (init_IRQ) from [<c03508d4>] (start_kernel+0x1b8/0x350)
[<c03508d4>] (start_kernel) from [<a0008040>] (0xa0008040)70 __irq_set_handler+0x118/0x128()
To be fair, this is not a new warning. Only reason for it to show up now is that
I recently added mainstone to my list of tests. The problem is also seen with v3.14.
I do not see it with the current mainline kernel, so it must have been fixed
at some point. I may do a reverse bisect if I find the time. For the time being,
this is not a concern.
Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists