| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJY7BcKV2djvSGq8KoQKPyFdFvs395w4L2o5+Lbc3ng4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 09:27:39 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...sulko.com>,
Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] of: changesets: Introduce changeset helper methods
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
<pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com> wrote:
> Changesets are very powerful, but the lack of a helper API
> makes using them cumbersome. Introduce a simple copy based
> API that makes things considerably easier.
>
> To wit, adding a property using the raw API.
>
> struct property *prop;
> prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*prop)), GFP_KERNEL);
> prop->name = kstrdup("compatible");
> prop->value = kstrdup("foo,bar");
> prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
> of_changeset_add_property(ocs, np, prop);
>
> while using the helper API
>
> of_changeset_add_property_string(ocs, np, "compatible",
> "foo,bar");
Seems useful. Do we not have any users that can be converted?
[...]
> +static int __of_changeset_add_update_property_copy(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name, const void *value,
> + int length, bool update)
> +{
> + struct property *prop;
> + char *new_name;
> + void *new_value;
> + int ret = -ENOMEM;
> +
> + prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*prop), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!prop)
> + goto out_no_prop;
Just return here.
> +
> + new_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!new_name)
> + goto out_no_name;
> +
> + /*
> + * NOTE: There is no check for zero length value.
> + * In case of a boolean property, this will allocate a value
> + * of zero bytes. We do this to work around the use
> + * of of_get_property() calls on boolean values.
> + */
> + new_value = kmemdup(value, length, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!new_value)
> + goto out_no_value;
> +
> + of_property_set_flag(prop, OF_DYNAMIC);
> +
> + prop->name = new_name;
> + prop->value = new_value;
> + prop->length = length;
> +
> + if (!update)
> + ret = of_changeset_add_property(ocs, np, prop);
> + else
> + ret = of_changeset_update_property(ocs, np, prop);
> +
> + if (ret != 0)
if (!ret)
return 0;
> + goto out_no_add;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +out_no_add:
... and remove all this.
> + kfree(prop->value);
> +out_no_value:
> + kfree(prop->name);
> +out_no_name:
> + kfree(prop);
> +out_no_prop:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int __of_changeset_add_update_property_string(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name, const char *str,
> + bool update)
> +{
> + return __of_changeset_add_update_property_copy(ocs, np, name, str,
> + strlen(str) + 1, update);
> +}
> +
> +static int __of_changeset_add_update_property_stringv(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name,
> + const char *fmt, va_list vargs, bool update)
> +{
> + char *str;
> + int ret;
> +
> + str = kvasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, fmt, vargs);
> + if (!str)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = __of_changeset_add_update_property_string(ocs, np, name, str, update);
> +
> + kfree(str);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int __of_changeset_add_update_property_string_list(
> + struct of_changeset *ocs, struct device_node *np, const char *name,
> + const char **strs, int count, bool update)
> +{
> + int total = 0, i, ret;
> + char *value, *s;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> + /* check if it's NULL */
> + if (!strs[i])
> + return -EINVAL;
> + total += strlen(strs[i]) + 1;
> + }
> +
> + value = kmalloc(total, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!value)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0, s = value; i < count; i++) {
> + /* no need to check for NULL, check above */
> + strcpy(s, strs[i]);
> + s += strlen(strs[i]) + 1;
> + }
> +
> + ret = __of_changeset_add_update_property_copy(ocs, np, name, value,
> + total, update);
> +
> + kfree(value);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int __of_changeset_add_update_property_u32(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name, u32 val, bool update)
> +{
> + /* in place */
> + val = cpu_to_be32(val);
Kill this function and move this to the 2 callers.
> + return __of_changeset_add_update_property_copy(ocs, np, name, &val,
> + sizeof(val), update);
> +}
> +
> +static int __of_changeset_add_update_property_bool(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name, bool update)
> +{
I think this intermediate function could be killed off too.
> + return __of_changeset_add_update_property_copy(ocs, np, name, "", 0,
> + update);
> +}
[...]
> +static struct device_node *
> +__of_changeset_node_move_one(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, struct device_node *new_parent)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np2;
> + const char *unitname;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = of_changeset_detach_node(ocs, np);
> + if (err)
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> +
> + unitname = strrchr(np->full_name, '/');
> + if (!unitname)
> + unitname = np->full_name;
> +
> + np2 = __of_node_dup(np, "%s/%s",
> + new_parent->full_name, unitname);
> + if (!np2)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + np2->parent = new_parent;
> +
> + err = of_changeset_attach_node(ocs, np2);
> + if (err)
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> +
> + return np2;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * of_changeset_node_move_to - Moves a subtree to a new place in
> + * the tree
> + *
> + * @ocs: changeset pointer
> + * @np: device node pointer to be moved
> + * @to: device node of the new parent
> + *
> + * Moves a subtree to a new place in the tree.
> + * Note that a move is a safe operation because the phandles
> + * remain valid.
I'm having a hard time imagining a usecase for this one. I would drop
until we have a user in tree.
> + *
> + * Returns zero on success, a negative error value otherwise.
> + */
> +int of_changeset_node_move(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, struct device_node *new_parent)
> +{
> + struct device_node *npc, *nppc;
> +
> + /* move the root first */
> + nppc = __of_changeset_node_move_one(ocs, np, new_parent);
> + if (IS_ERR(nppc))
> + return PTR_ERR(nppc);
> +
> + /* move the subtrees next */
> + for_each_child_of_node(np, npc) {
> + nppc = __of_changeset_node_move_one(ocs, npc, nppc);
> + if (IS_ERR(nppc)) {
> + of_node_put(npc);
> + return PTR_ERR(nppc);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index 3175803..f015911 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -1037,6 +1037,42 @@ static inline int of_changeset_update_property(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> {
> return of_changeset_action(ocs, OF_RECONFIG_UPDATE_PROPERTY, np, prop);
> }
> +
> +struct device_node *of_changeset_create_device_nodev(
> + struct of_changeset *ocs, struct device_node *parent,
> + const char *fmt, va_list vargs);
> +__printf(3, 4) struct device_node *of_changeset_create_device_node(
> + struct of_changeset *ocs, struct device_node *parent,
> + const char *fmt, ...);
> +int of_changeset_add_property_copy(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name,
> + const void *value, int length);
> +int of_changeset_add_property_string(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name, const char *str);
> +__printf(4, 5) int of_changeset_add_property_stringf(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name, const char *fmt, ...);
> +int of_changeset_add_property_string_list(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name, const char **strs, int count);
> +int of_changeset_add_property_u32(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name, u32 val);
> +int of_changeset_add_property_bool(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name);
> +int of_changeset_update_property_copy(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name,
> + const void *value, int length);
> +int of_changeset_update_property_string(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name, const char *str);
> +__printf(4, 5) int of_changeset_update_property_stringf(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name, const char *fmt, ...);
> +int of_changeset_update_property_string_list(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name, const char **strs, int count);
> +int of_changeset_update_property_u32(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name, u32 val);
> +int of_changeset_update_property_bool(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, const char *name);
> +int of_changeset_node_move(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np, struct device_node *new_parent);
A bunch of these can be static inline wrappers.
You need EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL on these as well.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists