lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 9 May 2016 06:15:46 +0200
From:	René Nyffenegger <mail@...enyffenegger.ch>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Zach Brown <zab@...hat.com>, Milosz Tanski <milosz@...in.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use pid_t instead of int

Somewhere else, pid_t is a typedef for an int.

Rene

On 09.05.2016 03:25, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 12:38 PM, René Nyffenegger
> <mail@...enyffenegger.ch> wrote:
>> Use pid_t instead of int in the declarations of sys_kill, sys_tgkill,
>> sys_tkill and sys_rt_sigqueueinfo in include/linux/syscalls.h
> 
> The description is no good.  *Why* are you changing it?
> 
> I checked tgkill and, indeed, tgkill takes pid_t parameters, so this
> fixes an incorrect declaration.  I'm wondering why the code compiles
> without warning.  Is SYSCALL_DEFINE too lenient for some reason?  Or
> is pid_t just defined as int.
> 
> --Andy
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ