[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57300EF2.7030303@renenyffenegger.ch>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 06:15:46 +0200
From: René Nyffenegger <mail@...enyffenegger.ch>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Zach Brown <zab@...hat.com>, Milosz Tanski <milosz@...in.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use pid_t instead of int
Somewhere else, pid_t is a typedef for an int.
Rene
On 09.05.2016 03:25, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 12:38 PM, René Nyffenegger
> <mail@...enyffenegger.ch> wrote:
>> Use pid_t instead of int in the declarations of sys_kill, sys_tgkill,
>> sys_tkill and sys_rt_sigqueueinfo in include/linux/syscalls.h
>
> The description is no good. *Why* are you changing it?
>
> I checked tgkill and, indeed, tgkill takes pid_t parameters, so this
> fixes an incorrect declaration. I'm wondering why the code compiles
> without warning. Is SYSCALL_DEFINE too lenient for some reason? Or
> is pid_t just defined as int.
>
> --Andy
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists