[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5730A4D9.40602@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 08:55:21 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Paolo <paolo.valente@...aro.org>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX] block: add missing group association in bio_split
On 05/09/2016 08:39 AM, Paolo wrote:
> Il 09/05/2016 16:35, Jeff Moyer ha scritto:
>> Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com> writes:
>>
>>> Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> @@ -1811,6 +1811,11 @@ struct bio *bio_split(struct bio *bio, int
>>>> sectors,
>>>>
>>>> bio_advance(bio, split->bi_iter.bi_size);
>>>>
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP
>>>> + if (bio->bi_css)
>>>> + bio_associate_blkcg(split, bio->bi_css);
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>> return split;
>>>> }
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_split);
>>>
>>> Get rid of the #ifdefery. This should be just:
>>>
>>> bio_associate_blkcg(split, bio->bi_css);
>>
>> Gah, I see that the bi_css member is only present for CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP.
>> I guess we'll have to live with the ifdef.
>>
>
> We have already tried to remove it, but it seems it would require other
> major changes.
It'd be cleaner to have a
bio_clone_associate_blkcg(split, bio);
or similar, and then hide it in there.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists