[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160509152848.GJ3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 17:28:48 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>
Cc: pavankumar kondeti <pavankumar.kondeti@...il.com>,
Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
byungchul.park@....com
Subject: Re: Migrated CFS task getting an unfair advantage
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 11:00:42AM -0800, Andrew Hunter wrote:
> At Google, we essentially reverted 88ec22d and the subsequent tweaks
> to it, keeping vruntime absolute always , instead using
> task_move_group_fair to change the basis of relative min_vruntime
> between cpus. We found this made it a lot easier to reason about and
> work with corss-cpu computations. I could post the patch if it would
> be of interest...
Andrew, any luck getting these patches brushed up?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists