linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: samsung: exynos5420: Remove useless check for return value of samsung_clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 9 May 2016 19:30:38 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: samsung: exynos5420: Remove useless check for
 return value of samsung_clk_init

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 09:32:47AM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
> 
> On 05/08/2016 05:24 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > The samsung_clk_init() cannot return NULL. Either it returns allocated
> > memory or it panics.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> > index 92382cef9f90..770c0f007c6b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> > @@ -1356,8 +1356,6 @@ static void __init exynos5x_clk_init(struct device_node *np,
> >  	exynos5x_soc = soc;
> >  
> >  	ctx = samsung_clk_init(np, reg_base, CLK_NR_CLKS);
> > -	if (!ctx)
> > -		panic("%s: unable to allocate context.\n", __func__);
> >
> 
> Indeed, the check is superfluous. I see that most callers [0] currently
> do the same, so probably makes sense to remove those too in this patch.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>

Thanks, I'll change this everywhere.


Best regards,
Krzysztof