linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/21] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: turn into monolithic driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160509175647.GE10508@lunn.ch>
Date:	Mon, 9 May 2016 19:56:47 +0200
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/21] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: turn into
 monolithic driver

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 01:22:37PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> This patchset merges all mv88e6* drivers supported by the shared
> mv88e6xxx code into a single mv88e6xxx DSA switch driver.
> 
> Some flags are added to describe the capabilities of a switch model,
> such as the presence of a PPU, EEPROM, some old or new registers, etc.
> 
> First these flags are used to conditionally support the same set of
> functions in every driver, then specific driver files are removed in
> favor of the common mv88e6xxx driver.
> 
> Only the merge of driver specific setup code assumes a few differences.
> If these differences such as frames priorities are really needed for
> some models, they can easily be brought back in a future patch.
> 
> Some inconsistencies might show up, such as the need for
> MV88E6XXX_FLAG_PPU and MV88E6XXX_FLAG_PPU_ACTIVE flags. But this
> patchset does not aim to fix them yet. A future patch can do that if
> they end up being unwanted.
> 
> The patchset has been tested on interconnected 88E6352 and 88E6185.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

I also tested v1, so

Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

Thanks
	Andrew