linux-kernel - Re: Regression introduced by cf6d445f68974d0b15a14cf6021be38a91f2b5d8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1605092132090.3540@nanos>
Date:	Mon, 9 May 2016 21:48:18 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-team <Kernel-team@...com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Regression introduced by
 cf6d445f68974d0b15a14cf6021be38a91f2b5d8

Josef,

On Mon, 9 May 2016, Josef Bacik wrote:

> I've hit a regression that was introduced by the commit in $SUBJECT. I'm
> building a minimal kernel config that doesn't have CONFIG_SMP set, which
> results in the topology for the box to look different than with CONFIG_SMP
> set. Specifically boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores comes out to 16 without
> CONFIG_SMP set, but 12 with CONFIG_SMP set.

So the commit is just exposing the underlying wreckage.

x86_max_cores is set via:

      detect_extended_topology(), which is a NOOP in case of SMP=n

or

      if the above is not available, which is the case for SMP=n, then it
      uses:

      intel_num_cpu_cores()

      That's using the cache leaf Bits 26-31: 

      Maximum number of addressable IDs for processor cores in the physical
      package

      And that's 16 for this CPU, but that has nothing to do with the actual
      number of cores in the package.

So that explains the wreckage you are seing. We have two options to deal with
this:

1) Make intel_num_cpu_cores() a NOOP for SMP=n, so x86_max_cores = 1

2) Make detect_extended_topology() functional for SMP=n, so the real number of
   cores is detected

Both options work and make sense.

Though I don't know whether the uncore stuff wants to see all boxes of a
package even in the SMP=n case. Kan?

Thanks,

	tglx