[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1462772246.5344.4.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 13:37:26 +0800
From: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 8/9] clk: mediatek: Add config options for MT2701
subsystem clocks
HI Stephen,
On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 16:02 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/14, James Liao wrote:
> > MT2701 subsystem clocks are optional and should be enabled only if
> > their subsystem drivers are ready to control these clocks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>
> > ---
>
> Why is this patch split off from the patch that introduces the
> file?
I was looking for comments about how to make subsystem clocks optional.
So I used a separated patch to do it. Is it an acceptable way to use
config options to enable subsystem clock support?
Best regards,
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists