linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 42/59] x86/sysfb_efi: Fix valid BAR address range check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1462823777-8384-43-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Mon,  9 May 2016 12:56:00 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 42/59] x86/sysfb_efi: Fix valid BAR address range check

4.2.8-ckt10 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>

commit c10fcb14c7afd6688c7b197a814358fecf244222 upstream.

The code for checking whether a BAR address range is valid will break
out of the loop when a start address of 0x0 is encountered.

This behaviour is wrong since by breaking out of the loop we may miss
the BAR that describes the EFI frame buffer in a later iteration.

Because of this bug I can't use video=efifb: boot parameter to get
efifb on my new ThinkPad E550 for my old linux system hard disk with
3.10 kernel. In 3.10, efifb is the only choice due to DRM/I915 not
supporting the GPU.

This patch also add a trivial optimization to break out after we find
the frame buffer address range without testing later BARs.

Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
[ Rewrote changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Cc: linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1462454061-21561-2-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/sysfb_efi.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sysfb_efi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sysfb_efi.c
index b285d4e..5da924b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/sysfb_efi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sysfb_efi.c
@@ -106,14 +106,24 @@ static int __init efifb_set_system(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
 					continue;
 				for (i = 0; i < DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE; i++) {
 					resource_size_t start, end;
+					unsigned long flags;
+
+					flags = pci_resource_flags(dev, i);
+					if (!(flags & IORESOURCE_MEM))
+						continue;
+
+					if (flags & IORESOURCE_UNSET)
+						continue;
+
+					if (pci_resource_len(dev, i) == 0)
+						continue;
 
 					start = pci_resource_start(dev, i);
-					if (start == 0)
-						break;
 					end = pci_resource_end(dev, i);
 					if (screen_info.lfb_base >= start &&
 					    screen_info.lfb_base < end) {
 						found_bar = 1;
+						break;
 					}
 				}
 			}
-- 
2.7.4