[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMsMSK-MwY6HDmb45vj6g2BTM9yk7+g5oP0hEm9gk6Gi7f+XjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 15:31:31 -0700
From: Chris Brand <chris.brand@...adcom.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Raymond Ngun <raymond.ngun@...adcom.com>,
Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support BCM23550 SoC
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
[...]
> Looks really nice overall, I only found one tiny detail I commented on
> for patch 6.
Thanks!
> I'm glad to see work on the old chips resume, are you working on new
> code for it as well, or just upstreaming the patches that were already
> done in the past?
This is new work. It was actually a good testament to the value of
upstreaming that it was so easy to bring up a 4.6 kernel on this chip.
Chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists