lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <57317292.2080004@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 10 May 2016 07:33:06 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/22] ARM: dts: exynos: Move common
 Exynos5410/542x/5800 nodes to new DTSI

On 05/09/2016 11:53 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
> 
> On 05/08/2016 03:06 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The Exynos5410/542x/5800 are very similar designs. Create new new
> 
> s/new new/a new
> 
>> DTSI with common nodes to remove DTS duplication. Although currently
>> only MCT and SysRAM are shared but in future more nodes will be added to
>> common file.
>>
>> The patch should not have functional impact.
>>
> 
> A nice way to check this is to diff the disassembled compiled DTBs with
> and without the patch and making sure that the resulted DTS is the same.

Yes, that is what I've done. Recently there is a tool making that even
easier: dtx_diff.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ