linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 20/22] ARM: dts: exynos: Move common Exynos5410/542x/5800 nodes to new DTSI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 May 2016 07:33:06 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/22] ARM: dts: exynos: Move common
 Exynos5410/542x/5800 nodes to new DTSI

On 05/09/2016 11:53 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
> 
> On 05/08/2016 03:06 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The Exynos5410/542x/5800 are very similar designs. Create new new
> 
> s/new new/a new
> 
>> DTSI with common nodes to remove DTS duplication. Although currently
>> only MCT and SysRAM are shared but in future more nodes will be added to
>> common file.
>>
>> The patch should not have functional impact.
>>
> 
> A nice way to check this is to diff the disassembled compiled DTBs with
> and without the patch and making sure that the resulted DTS is the same.

Yes, that is what I've done. Recently there is a tool making that even
easier: dtx_diff.

Best regards,
Krzysztof