[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3339348.mi5ytyqrb0@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 02:04:41 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@...eaurora.org>,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states
On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 01:30:10 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
> ACPI 6.0 introduced an optional object _LPI that provides an alternate
> method to describe Low Power Idle states. It defines the local power
> states for each node in a hierarchical processor topology. The OSPM can
> use _LPI object to select a local power state for each level of processor
> hierarchy in the system. They used to produce a composite power state
> request that is presented to the platform by the OSPM.
>
> Since multiple processors affect the idle state for any non-leaf hierarchy
> node, coordination of idle state requests between the processors is
> required. ACPI supports two different coordination schemes: Platform
> coordinated and OS initiated.
>
> This patch adds initial support for Platform coordination scheme of LPI.
>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 11 +-
> drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 2 +-
> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 441 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> include/acpi/processor.h | 25 ++-
> include/linux/acpi.h | 4 +
> 5 files changed, 422 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Yet to be discussed(retained as in from previous version):
I somehow didn't realize that you had been waiting for my feedback. Sorry
about that.
> - Kconfig entry removal: Need feedback on how to deal with that
> without having to introduce dummy _CST related ARM64 callbacks
> - Didn't defer processing of LPI buffers to flattening as it
> results in the same buffer decoded multiple times
> - ACPI_CSTATE_INTEGER : IMO it's reasonable to keep it aroundsince the
> it's part of LPI specification(not just ARM FFH)
OK, I'll have a look tomorrow.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists