[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaeZ14hfz-gRetRcdj8NzzyqigV1ZtDSWAwveFxwAgt0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 14:08:45 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...glemail.com>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] gpio: mmio: add DT support for memory-mapped GPIOs
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Christian Lamparter
<chunkeey@...glemail.com> wrote:
> From: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
>
> This patch adds support for defining memory-mapped GPIOs which
> are compatible with the existing gpio-mmio interface.
Overall very nice, just waiting for the next version.
> The first user for this binding is "wd,mbl-gpio".
And that binding defines that we have a register named "dat".
> + if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "no-output"))
And then this too.
Do we want these generic MMIO bindings (dat, no-output)
in a special document like
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mmio.txt?
Going forward?
This patch set mainly deals with refactorings, but in the
long run we want to slim things down a bit and use standard
bindings I think.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists